Court monitoring for AML and KYC workflows

Add court and entity context to customer due diligence.

Argus Delta helps real estate professionals, financial planners, wealth teams, and compliance programs monitor customers, beneficial owners, counterparties, vendors, and related entities with source-backed court, ASIC, ABN, and insolvency context.

All sign-ups are reviewed and approved by the Argus Delta team.

The problem

KYC is becoming an ongoing workflow, not a once-off identity check.

Australia's AML/CTF reforms bring real estate professionals, property developers, lawyers, accountants, conveyancers, and other tranche 2 businesses into the regime from 1 July 2026. Current reporting entities, including many financial-planning and wealth workflows, are also moving through reformed CDD, ongoing monitoring, PEP, source-of-funds, source-of-wealth, and record-keeping expectations.

Common checks

Where public court context supports the CDD file.

Argus Delta does not replace identity verification, sanctions screening, PEP screening, or legal AML advice. It adds source-backed court and entity context to the review trail when a customer, beneficial owner, vendor, or related entity changes risk.

Before onboarding a vendor or purchaser

Check the customer, company, ABN, ACN, directors, beneficial-owner names, and related entities for court activity or insolvency context.

During source-of-funds or source-of-wealth review

Surface public court or insolvency signals that may support escalation, enhanced due diligence, or a request for more information.

When a customer becomes higher risk

Route fresh court activity around a customer, beneficial owner, PEP, trust, company, or related party to the AML/KYC owner.

Before suspicious-matter or internal escalation

Attach the source listing, match reason, business-register context, and reviewer note so the decision can be reconstructed later.

What we monitor for you

Watchlists aligned to regulated customer and entity review.

Add customers, vendors, companies, trusts, directors, beneficial owners, counterparties, and related entities your program has lawful reason to monitor.

Customers

Customers and applicants

Watch vendors, purchasers, wealth clients, financial-planning clients, and counterparties through the review lifecycle.

Entities

Companies, ABNs, ACNs, and trading names

Use business-register context to disambiguate organisations, trading names, related entities, and status changes.

Owners

Directors and beneficial-owner names

Monitor directors, controllers, beneficial-owner names, trustees, and related parties where your program records them.

Signals

Court and insolvency signals

Surface public court activity, winding-up, bankruptcy, insolvency, enforcement, and other source-backed risk signals.

What an alert looks like

A CDD signal with the source and match reason attached.

The alert is designed to support a review, not make the AML decision. It shows what matched, why it matched, what source supports it, and who reviewed it.

Watchlist Scoped

Watched: Customer and related entities

Subjects Customer, company, ABN, ACN, trust, director, beneficial-owner name, vendor, purchaser, or related party.
Purpose Each watch is tied to onboarding, ongoing CDD, enhanced due diligence, transaction review, or internal escalation.
Ownership Alerts route to the AML/KYC officer, compliance lead, adviser, agency principal, or file owner.
CDDOwnershipLawful purpose
Alert Source-backed

Court or entity signal matched the customer file

Match reason The alert shows the matched name, company, ABN, ACN, case reference, or related-party rule.
Context Court, listing date, party role, ASIC/ABN context, insolvency context, and source restrictions where available.
Source The original public listing or register source is preserved so the reviewer can verify before escalating.
Match reasonEntity contextSource
Review trail Auditable

The CDD action is recorded

Reviewer decision Record whether the signal triggered no action, more information, enhanced due diligence, internal escalation, or reporting review.
Evidence Keep source, observation time, match reason, reviewer, and file reference together.
Boundary A public court signal is not an AML finding. It is context for a human compliance review.
ReviewEscalationAudit
Workflow

Watch, enrich, review, record.

Built for AML/KYC programs that need source-backed context inside onboarding, ongoing CDD, enhanced due diligence, and escalation workflows.

01

Define the monitored file

Add customers, entities, ABNs, ACNs, directors, beneficial-owner names, trusts, vendors, purchasers, and counterparties.

02

Enrich and match

Resolve watched names against court sources, ASIC/ABN context, insolvency notices, and related-party records where supported.

03

Review the signal

Open the source, match reason, entity context, and file owner before deciding the CDD action.

04

Record the outcome

Keep the reviewer decision, source, timestamp, and escalation path attached to the customer or matter file.

Why governance matters

KYC context needs a defensible boundary.

Court and register signals can support due diligence, but the product must preserve purpose, access, source context, and human review.

Purpose-scoped monitoring

Watched entities are tied to onboarding, ongoing CDD, enhanced due diligence, or a defined compliance workflow.

Source-backed records

Every signal keeps the source, observation time, match reason, and entity context available for review.

Controlled access

Roles and permissions restrict who can add customers, inspect signals, export evidence, and review escalations.

Human decision point

Argus Delta does not decide suspicious matters or customer risk. It supports the review trail.

Access

Add court and entity context to AML/KYC review.

Tell us which customers, entities, transaction workflows, and escalation points your compliance team needs to monitor.

All sign-ups are reviewed and approved by the Argus Delta team.